Re: officially retire 1.9?
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> [...] > But the amount of work involved in everyone else running tests and
> releases must also be considered. We barely made the required signature count
> for our last 3 releases. Focussing our volunteer resources on releases that
> are actually used by Debian and Red Hat (as reference platforms that usually
> ship our "oldest" releases) seems fair.
>> So I vote for softly reducing the support effort while leaving it documented
>> as "supported".
> That's fine with me. It would more or less amount to the same thing :)
> We have had "security and data corruption fixes only" backport guidelines
> in the past. I'd suggest we could apply this to 1.9.
Sounds good to me.
Received on 2019-08-16 11:47:42 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev