[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn obliterate - more feasible these days?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 14:34:09 -0400

lists_at_m8y.org wrote on Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:26 +00:00:
> Hi. As a bit of an introduction... I was hanging out on
> irc://irc.freenode.net/svn since we use svn at work due to its
> simplicity, flexibility with regards to tag/branch structuring, easy
> narrow/shallow, centralisation, quite a lot of supporting tooling out
> there..

Welcome to the list :)

> I asked what svn had along those lines and following conversation
> ensued:
> https://m8y.org/chats/svn_obliterate.xhtml
> ^^^ Link to IRC chatlog of mostly danielsh explaining complexities with
> amending history in svn ^^^

For the archives, that conversation starts here:
.
    https://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/svn?date=2019-03-27#l124
.
and continues on and off during the next two days.

Cheers,

Daniel
Received on 2019-03-29 19:34:27 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.