On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:24 AM Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:47 AM Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>> > Ha ha! It's laugh-out-loud ugly, that teeny-tiny viewport...
>>
>> I hope my sense of humour was not badly misjudged. Seeing that Mark wrote
>> it "Looks good" without any smiley, maybe everyone else is not seeing what
>> I saw. The attached screenshot shows how it renders in Firefox.
>>
>> I genuinely was delighted to see it working at all.
>>
>
> I was using an iPad. I do not know if it was the smaller screen or if iOS
> does something to make the iFrame "fit" but in general it looked fine.
> Looking at it now on my desktop I see the same tiny viewport as you.
>
> In general iFrame's are gross and a source of problems, but they are also
> super convenient so I get it. I was mainly happy to see the info come
> together and assume there are ways it can be finessed into looking better
> on various browsers. Since we have SSI's available that seems like an easy
> initial solution to avoid needing the iFrame.
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
The "responsive iframes" technique described at the following page works
with things like embedded YouTube videos to size the frame correctly for
desktop and mobile:
https://blog.theodo.fr/2018/01/responsive-iframes-css-trick/
Maybe it will help in this case too.
<http://markphip.blogspot.com/>
>
Received on 2019-01-04 15:48:33 CET