Re: authz changes between 1.9 and 1.10

On 05.12.2018 15:05, Julian Foad wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 05.12.2018 14:44, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>> Yes, but I'm asking for a review of the BNF to make sure that it doesn't
>>>> contain silly bugs.
>>> At first glance, I saw what looks like a bug: it says a comment must have a non-white-space immediately after the '#'... I didn't review further.
>> The <text> production used imply "optional". I already fixed that and
>> how the comment definition reads:
>>
>> <comment> ::= "#" <opt-text> <line-end>
> The problem is <opt-text> isn't allowed to start with whitespace.

Eh, you're right; I redefined <opt-text> to fix that, which also fixes
<key-value>.

-- Brane
Received on 2018-12-05 15:23:42 CET