Re: API review for 1.11; do we need to mark new APIs as experimental?

Julian Foad wrote:
> [...] Are we saying now
> that they need not be specifically marked if we feel they are pretty
> safe? If we say that, then marking specific APIs as "experimental" in a
> regular release signifies only that we consider them more experimental
> (less stable) than others.
>
> That might be fine. Anyone developing against a regular release is
> necessarily developing against new (experimental) APIs, so maybe no
> explicit warning mechanism is necessary.

I have gone ahead with producing a release candidate 1.11.0-rc1 with things just as they are. It currently seems OK to me. If we decide we need to change this, we can.

-- 
- Julian