Re: [RFC] Move CHANGES and COMMITTERS out of trunk/branches

Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:46 +0200:
> (why would CHANGES in a 1.9.x tarball need to contain changes of the
> 1.8 line?)

I see no reason for a 1.9.x tarball to contain the CHANGES stanzas of
1.8.y with y>1, since the contents of those sections are repeated under
1.9.x sections, but I do see a reason for 1.9.x to contain the 1.z.0
CHANGES entries even for z<=8: bugfixes listed in those section are
included in the subject tarball and aren't listed under any 1.9.x
CHANGES section.

Cheers,

Daniel
Received on 2018-07-16 21:55:04 CEST