Julian Foad wrote on Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:20 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > The 'CHANGES' file in the 1.10.1 tarball is missing the last two
> > > changes, that were merged last night:
> > The CHANGES file in 1.10.1 also has a "Version 1.11.0" section with some
> > bugfixes listed in it.
> > I think CHANGES in 1.10.x (and earlier) releases shouldn't have a
> > section for trunk since the contents of 1.11.0 may change between now
> > and when 1.11.0-GA is tagged.
> Yes, it's a bit ugly. Sorry.
> Is it important enough that you need me (or someone else) to scrap that
> attempt and re-roll? I can probably do so by next Monday, maybe earlier,
> if needed.
I'm not concerned about the fact that 1.11.0's changes are included in the 1.10.1
tarball in some form. That's just a documentation bug which we can fix for 1.10.2.
I am, however, concerned about downstreams obtaining the version number by parsing
the first line of CHANGES and getting 1.11.0.
That is: the form in which 1.11.0's changes are serialized into the
1.10.1 tarball is what concerns me.
Received on 2018-07-13 19:48:57 CEST