API compatibility promises in light of biannual releases (was: Re: Intentions for 1.11 release timing)
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:34:23 +0000
Julian Foad wrote on Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 14:26:53 +0100:
I wonder what our API compatibility promises would be in the new scheme.
In terms of the proposed scheme, we currently do only LTS releases, and once an
I assume our API current compatibility promises would apply unchanged to any
As an example, perhaps APIs new in a biannual release should only be supported
Or perhaps we just need to be more disciplined about properly marking APIs as
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.