Re: #4754: Status Cache

On 25.06.2018 13:21, Julian Foad wrote:
> Can someone confirm this makes sense as a feature request?
>
> I know the usual caveats apply: details need to be filled in, and lack of resources; but basically?

Basically, sure. In practice, though, I've never found these
notification services to be very reliable and consistent. All of them
tend to leak events in one way or another. It's OK to have 95%
correctness for painting icons in a GUI, but not OK for "svn status",
let alone "svn commit".

(I'd tend to be slightly miffed if a GUI told me I can't commit just
after I changed a file ...)

-- Brane
Received on 2018-06-25 13:29:13 CEST