Re: Intentions for 1.11 release timing
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_apache.org>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 14:54:03 +0100
Stefan Sperling wrote:
Yes, certainly we have to adjust our backporting guidelines!
> Would 1.10 only receive "security or data corruption
No, 1.10 would be designated "LTS" (long term support).
Because we haven't previously told users anything, they should assume that 1.10 will be supported over a similar time scale to previous releases. Therefore we should designate 1.10 as LTS, and 1.11 as a standard (non-LTS) release.
Definitions something like this:
Plus a bit extra (e.g. a couple of months) on each of these times.
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.