[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion clients following HTTP 302 response codes.

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:17:04 +0200

On 26.04.2018 11:47, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Re https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4738
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4738>
> If I paid for this to be developed (say on UpWork), what criteria
> would that work have to meet to be consumed into Subversion's trunk
> for later release?  I ask because I'd not want to pay for its
> development then have it rejected for a long list of reasons. I'd
> rather bake those into the acceptance criteria.

As with any contribution to any Apache project, "discuss design and
intended changes on the dev@ list" is a pretty basic requirement. I'd
suggest you start with that before issuing any work orders. Filing an
issue in Jira isn't the same as discussing the proposed change. There
has been very little discussion of your proposal on this list, and we're
nowhere near a consensus.

> As part of the paid development work I'd get copyright assigned to me
> by the contractor, and being an Apache member with a CLA on file from
> 2002 or so, I'd then grant copyright to Apache for the work.

Ah ... I don't think so? Contributors to Apache projects are
individuals, not companies (IMO, for the purpose of this discussion,
you'd count as "company" if you hired someone else do do the actual
work). If the scope of the work is large enough, the author must file an
ICLA. You don't get to stand in as a proxy.

-- Brane
Received on 2018-04-26 12:17:10 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.