[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 19:23:15 +0100

On 03.03.2018 19:15, James McCoy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:54:06PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> P.S.: Running tests now with the patched 1.10.x, will vote on the
>> backport as soon as that's done. If it's approved, I believe we have to
>> move our expected release date from 28th March to 4th April?
> According to the flowchart posted elsewhere, the soak period only need
> be extended if this had been found in the final week of the soak.
> From our docs on releasing:
> The stabilization period begins with a release candidate tarball with
> the version A.B.0-rc1. Further release candidate tarballs may be made as
> blocking bugs are fixed;
> ...
> Under some circumstances, the stabilization period will be extended:
> * If a potentially destabilizing change must be made in order to fix a
> bug, the entire four-week stabilization period is restarted.
> ...
> * If a critical bugfix is made during the final week of the
> stabilization period, the final week is restarted. The final A.B.0
> release is always identical to the release candidate made one week
> before (with the exceptions discussed below).
> I don't see anything about this bug that would require extending the
> soak.

You're right: 28th March it is.

-- Brane
Received on 2018-03-03 19:23:20 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.