Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 02:34:31PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
>>>> svn save -> svn shelf-save
>>>> svn shelve -> svn shelf-shelve
>>>> svn unshelve -> svn shelf-unshelve
>>>> svn shelves -> svn shelf-shelves
>>> This naming doesn't make any sense to me. Using a word root in the same
>>> command as both a noun and a verb runs counter to my notions of proper
>>> grammar. It doesn't look right. The following would be better:
>>> shelf-save, shelf-restore, shelf-list, shelf-log, shelf-drop,
>> Thanks for your thoughts.
>> You missed out the 'shelve' command (which is like 'save' but reverts the
>> modifications) which is probably the most difficult one to accommodate. What
>> do you propose for that? If you intend 'save' to include the revert then
>> what do propose for the form that doesn't revert (that is, form that creates
>> another save-point/check-point)?
>> I considered using the word 'restore'. It is fine in the context of
>> 'shelf-restore' but because of considering aliases I went for 'unshelve' as
>> the better one-word name, and let the two-word construction be ugly. I also
>> considered 'svn unshelve' as an alias with 'svn shelf-restore' as the
>> two-word form.
>> Similarly for 'shelves' vs. 'list', with an additional consideration here
>> that 'svn list' is already a command with a different meaning, a meaning
>> that could also usefully be applied to a shelf.
> How about a combination of new subcommands for actions which
> tranfer working copy state from/to the shelf (used frequently),
> and just one subcommand with options for management of the
> shelf itself (used less frequently), like:
> svn shelve
> svn unshelve
> svn shelf --list
> svn shelf --drop
> svn shelf --diff/--show
That's a totally reasonable approach, and is similar to (not exactly the
same as) what's currently implemented on trunk and on shelve-checkpoint
FWIW you missed out 'svn save' (create a checkpoint, don't revert from WC).
The discussion of syntax for referring to a particular shelf and version
is perhaps the more interesting part of the whole discussion; I would
welcome any thoughts on that part.
Received on 2018-01-08 16:29:51 CET