> On 11/12/2017 18:15, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> julianfoad_at_apache.org wrote on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:41 +0000:
>> Could you backport this to staging/ so future changes to staging don't
>> merge conflict when they are published?
> Since I was working on the site right now, I took the liberty and
> quickly did it in r1817860.
We discussed on IRC about this. I see 'staging' as being a development
branch and 'publish' as being the trunk, and changes being made directly
on the 'trunk' or on the branch according to how the developer feels
about needing or not needing a staging point. From that point of view,
this merge would be a catch-up merge and would be the normal expected
practice for anyone working on the staging branch to do from time to
time and immediately before promoting changes to 'publish'.
However that was just my assumption -- we haven't established that work
flow as a community.
Various other ideas and points were made on IRC -- see the log, starting
here, 25 mins long:
Received on 2017-12-13 21:28:15 CET