Re: Authz suggestion

>
>
> Specifically, by "currently" I mean that this is the state on trunk. :)
> I don't believe anyone is working on adding explicit traversal
> permission on trunk in time for 1.10. It would require some rework of
> the way the authz info is used within the core libraries, it's not just
> a question of teaching the authz parser a new trick.
>

I myself am never for holding up releases in order to add an extra feature,
if everything else about the work to date says 'release it' :)

This stuff is a corner case for me, and only topical as I've a very naive
parser for Authz files in Java. Test driven of course.

- Paul
Received on 2017-12-10 15:25:29 CET