[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Let's switch to time-based releases

From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:00:25 +0100

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Nathan Hartman <hartman.nathan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01.12.2017 13:16, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> Great! I gather from the reactions in this thread that we have
>>> consensus on the principle, we "just" need to do it :-). And figure
>>> out some details.
>>
>> Will that be Subversion 18.04 Anticlimactic Albatross?
>
> Please, please, DON'T do names like that!!!

Hehe, no :-).

In fact, we haven't really talked about version numbers / names in
this thread, and I'd like to keep it that way. I think this is
orthogonal to "should we go for time-based releases?". I suggest if
someone wants to discuss our versioning scheme, he/she should start a
new thread. Otherwise, I think we should just stick with our current
versioning scheme for now [1].

[1] http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-numbering

-- 
Johan
Received on 2017-12-01 21:00:52 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.