On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
wrote:
> Troy Curtis Jr wrote on Thu, 30 Nov 2017 02:20 +0000:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017, 10:08 AM Daniel Shahaf
>
> > But if you think it should go ahead and get put to trunk I'd be happy to
> do
> > so, you may be worried that I'm dragging this swig-py3 branch thing out
> :P
>
> I just think that, as a matter of best practices, small commits that are
> independent of the branch should go to trunk directly (& can be cherry-
> picked back to the feature branch). You shouldn't read any "slow
> progress" concern into it, no more than you should take offence at me
> wearing a seat belt while you're driving.
>
Huh, yeah that does make sense. I'll keep that in mind!
> > > While reviewing this I noticed that
> > > subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/svn_*.swg
> > > are created in the source dir rather than in the build dir. I suspect
> > > that might be a bug but I'm not familiar enough with these swig
> details.
> > >
> > >
> > Since I've been working in this area, I'll take a look and add a fix as
> > necessary.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
> > Thanks!
> > Troy
>
Received on 2017-12-01 05:16:12 CET