Re: Sparse checkouts suggestion

Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:03 +0200:
> On 19.09.2017 00:59, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > I like the `svn co svn://vcs/trunk --view foo`. Well maybe if in a
> > following `svn up` it would *remember the current view*, it would be good.
>
>
> I don't think there's any need to remember the "current view": a sparse
> working copy already maintains its topology, so the view spec is only
> needed on checkout to construct the sparse WC (and then update to
> explicitly change it, etc.)

What if the view excludes A/D, and then the wc is updated from a
revision where A/D doesn't exist, to a revision where it does?
Received on 2017-09-19 13:24:16 CEST