On 14.09.2017 14:47, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 14.09.2017 11:48, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> My opinion: don't allow upgrading individual externals-sub-wc's. It's
>> all or nothing IMHO.
> That's the way I'm leaning, too. I do have to figure out if the code for
> that is already in place, or whether I need some more wc-fu to invent it. :)
$ svn st
Performing status on external item at 'foo':
svn: E155021: This client is too old to work with the working copy at
'/Users/brane/src/svn/test/bar/foo' (format 32).
You need to get a newer Subversion client. For more details, see
The upgrade of the foo external working copy (using the client from the
better-pristines branch) worked without a hitch. So we currently do not
have any logic in the code to prevent partial upgrades or, in other
words, to prevent mixed-format working copies.
This needs fixing ... preferably on trunk.
Received on 2017-09-14 17:03:59 CEST