Re: Sparse checkouts suggestion
On 14.09.2017 14:50, Paul Hammant wrote:
> I ran pep8 over the sources and thought I'd remediated all the
> training spaces already. I'll finish the job.
> My alternative to the four globals is to pass the function pointers as
> parameters through one or two intermediates to the functions that
> would use them. Would that be acceptable? I can't just delete the
> globals (as is) because the places that need then would break on
> invocation. You saw why I was doing that, right?
Function parameters are better. Why not create a context object and pass
just one extra arg around?
Not sure though why you need os.system on that list ... these days it'd
be a lot better to use the subprocess module anyway.
Received on 2017-09-14 14:58:21 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev