Re: swig for 1.10.0

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 07:54:58PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> As others have said, configure already supports both 2.x and 3.x. The
> remaining question is just whether release.py should use 2.x or 3.x for
> rolling tarballs. release.py uses own swig version compiled directly
> from swig upstream sources, so availability of swig3 in OS packages
> isn't a blocker for upgrading release.py's swig version.
>
> (And tarball users don't need swig at all)

If release.py will require swig 3, then I won't be able to roll releases
until the OpenBSD port gets updated. I don't have a problem with that, but
it seems people were expecting me to roll another 1.10 alpha soon, so...
Received on 2017-07-11 22:43:47 CEST