Agreed - let me looking in Stefan's mods - I can take a look at the
client-side after that to see if I have a slot in the short-term.
What's a reasonable / agreed way of "giving something more visibility - re:
hook" ?
-j
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Jacek Materna <jacek_at_assembla.com> wrote:
> > Great to hear on 1.10 move along.
> >
> > On SHA1 I can help if you feel it may move things along in parallel - we
> > ended up having to use the pre-commit hook for our customer base as per
> > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/tools/hook-
> scripts/reject-known-sha1-collisions.sh?view=markup&pathrev=1784336
>
> Yes, that pre-commit hook is certainly a good thing at the moment.
> Maybe we can give it more visibility and make it more accessible when
> releasing 1.10.
>
> IIUC, after Stefan Fuhrman's recent commits trunk can now handle sha1
> collisions in the back end, i.e. the repository can store both
> colliding files correctly. So with 1.10 it would no longer be
> necessary to protect the back-end with this hook. But the client-side
> and 'svnadmin dump / load' still have problems. And even if those were
> fixed, the hook would still be useful to support older clients from
> your 1.10 server.
>
> --
> Johan
>
--
Jacek Materna
CTO
Assembla
210-410-7661
Received on 2017-05-04 12:34:36 CEST