[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: translations

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 19:38:05 +0000

Julian Foad wrote on Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 15:56:31 +0100:
> This sounds like a no-brainer to me. Of course we would want to do that. So
> let's get this moving by doing this easy step first -- just checking in the
> .pot -- right now, and then improve:
>
> 1. check it in now, manually, and try to remember to update it sometimes,
> manually;
>
> 2. automate the updating of it (in a daily builder?)
>

Without voicing an opinion about *whether* we should keep .pot in
version control...

I think that *if* we do so, then we should do step #2 directly, without
#1 first, for two reasons:

a. If we do #1 and not #2, we will probably end up with an outdated .pot
in HEAD. (And possibly in 1.10.0.tar.gz) Humans simply aren't as good
at running cron jobs as crond is ;-).

b. Doing #2 directly is very low overhead.

Cheers,

Daniel

> 3. use Pootle or whatever (discuss how, after 1. is done)
Received on 2017-02-05 20:42:11 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.