[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: wish for new API or extended one

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 19:52:42 +0100

On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 07:21:50PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 04:57:45PM +0100, Stefan Küng wrote:
> > But the problem with the description not being updated still persists.
> OK, I believe I see the problem.
> The *option* descriptions are updated.
> But the conflict descriptions are not. I'll see what I can do about that.

Should be fixed by https://svn.apache.org/r1781696

But only for 'incoming delete' conflicts!

For 'local missing' conflicts we currently lack the infrastructure
to support selection of move targets. This should be fixed, too.
If somebody wants to help out, then this might be a good task to get
started in the conflict resolver code. It should be a mostly mechanical
change, using the 'incoming delete' code as an example for adding the
missing bits and pieces to the 'local missing' code.
Received on 2017-02-04 19:52:53 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.