On 11/30/2016 11:32 AM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Stefan Hett <luke1410_at_gmx.de> writes:
>
>> Would it be better to only list 1.9.5 as fix version in such cases?
>> I mean: It's practical implicit that any fix present in a released
>> version is also present on trunk, no?
>>
>>> Evgeny Kotkov resolved SVN-4660.
>>> --------------------------------
>>> Resolution: Fixed
>>> Fix Version/s: (was: 1.10.0)
>>> 1.9.5
>>> trunk
>>>
>>> Fix for this issue was included in Subversion 1.9.5.
> I changed this, because "Fix Version(s): 1.10.0" is misleading for the
> users, as it refers to an unreleased version.
>
> No opinion on whether we should remove "trunk" from here. I am fine
> with either approach, but what we have right now is consistent between
> different JIRA tickets.
>
>
> Regards,
> Evgeny Kotkov
>
Sounds reasonable to leave it then.
Just bare in mind that IMO it would be good to change the name of the
version (trunk) to 1.10(.0) upon release of the new version and create a
new version (named "trunk") then.
--
Regards,
Stefan Hett
Received on 2016-11-30 12:20:47 CET