[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Failed fs-test 65 (Was: Re: 1.9.5 up for signing/testing)

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_apache.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:34:46 +0000

Branko Čibej wrote:
> To be quite candid, I'm not surprised ... this wouldn't be the first
> time that Apple messed up its patches of perfectly good upstream
> software. :(
> The question is: what do we do about it? Complaining to Apple isn't
> likely to help. We could add a special case in the testcase for that
> version of SQLite on OSX, just to keep the test output in the green. But
> ... that seems like just a bit overdone.

Just a drive-by thought: Should we report this to SQLite? Especially if
by distilling the Subversion test we could write a SQLite self-test. I
recall the SQLite team is big on thorough regression testing and so
would likely want to know about this.

(They then might have some influence with the Apple folks, or maybe not,
but that's for them to deal with. It won't change our situation in the
short time with regard to this particular version.)

- Julian
Received on 2016-11-24 10:34:50 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.