Re: Sign advisories?

On 25.10.2016 19:50, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 19:44:28 +0200:
>> If we do this, I'd argue for making the files ASCII-armored PGP, not
>> keeping signatures separate.
> Inline PGP has a problem with lines that start with a hyphen, which
> occur in patches.
>
> I think our options are:
>
> - Use detached signatures

You just convinced me ...

> - Indent the patches one space
> - Tell gpg(1) not to escape minuses on the first column
> - Okay if people use gpg(1)
> - Breaks compatibility with other PGP implementations
> - Do nothing
> - Okay if people use GNU patch
> - Not okay if people use 'svn patch' or a third-party patch(1) implementation
Received on 2016-10-25 20:01:52 CEST