Stefan wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 17:30:57 +0200:
> Add an XFail test for issue #4642 (Setting depth to exclude for a path
> containing unversioned files requires a cleanup afterwards).
Looks good overall. Just a few minor questions:
> +def fold_tree_with_unversioned_items(sbox):
> + "unversioned files in excluded directory"
> + ign_a, ign_b, ign_c, wc_dir = set_up_depthy_working_copies(sbox,
> + infinity=True)
I see that "ign_a" is a preëxisting convention throughout the file.
It's unfortunate we have our own convention, since there's already
a Python convention for an ignored value in a tuple unpacking: using "_"
as the assigned-to variable name.
> + # create an unversioned directory within a versioned one
> + A_path = sbox.ospath('A')
> + A_local_path = os.path.join(A_path, 'A_local')
> + os.mkdir(A_local_path)
> + # Set A to be excluded.
> + svntest.main.run_svn(None, 'update', '--set-depth=exclude', A_path)
> + # try a simple update afterwards
> + svntest.main.run_svn(None, 'update', wc_dir)
Don't we prefer «sbox.simple_update()» for new code?
> @@ -3009,6 +3027,7 @@
> + fold_tree_with_unversioned_items,
Both of these lines use tabs instead of spaces.
Received on 2016-10-14 20:55:23 CEST