Re: [PATCH v2] Conflict option labels

On 13 October 2016 at 15:52, Patrick Steinhardt <ps_at_pks.im> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:46:32PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
[..]
> [snip]
>
> By the way, one problem that still exists is consistency. Right
> now, we have a mixture of labels where the first character is
> uppercased and labels where the first character is lowercased.
> With GUI clients in mind I personally lend towards using
> uppercased labels, but I'd need to adjust remaining labels to
> provide them (maybe in a separate patch, this one is big enough
> already as-is).
>
> Any opinions?
>
I'm for uppercased labels.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov