On 6/23/2016 00:33, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Hett <stefan_at_egosoft.com> wrote:
>> On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
[...]
>>>>
>>>> 2) Remove some questions that are unlikely to be relevant /
>>>> interesting anymore (e.g. "How is Subversion affected by the 2007
>>>> changes in Daylight Savings Time (DST)?")
>> For outdated information: Fully agree.
>> For BDB-related information, I would not yet call it outdated though. At
>> least not before BDB support is dropped from SVN completely (and then
>> (re-)move that information at the same time when the old-stable version no
>> longer supports it), since it's still applicable to the current supported
>> version.
> Hm, I'd say we move BDB-questions to the deprecated section in the
> FAQ, since it's been deprecated since 1.8 [1], which is our old stable
> version. I'm not talking about removing information, but let's move
> them to the deprecated section.
+1 (non-binding) from my side :-)
> [1] http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#bdb-deprecated
Regards,
Stefan
Received on 2016-06-23 00:54:21 CEST