On 15 May 2016 at 03:02, Stefan <luke1410_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> On 5/15/2016 01:13, Stefan wrote:
>>
>> [[[
>> Add a troubleshooting section to 1.9 to help users tracing down problems
>> related to proxies when locking/unlocking multiple files.
>>
>> * docs/release-notes/1.9.html
>> (troubleshooting): Add new section including http-pipelining issue
>> description.
>> ]]]
>
>
> Small correction to patchnotes:
>
> [[[
> Add a troubleshooting section to 1.9 to help users tracing down problems
> related to proxies when locking/unlocking multiple files.
>
> * docs/release-notes/1.9.html
> (troubleshooting): Add new section including http-pipelining issue
> description.
> (news): Add link to new troubleshooting section.
> ]]]
>
I think it's better to use term "HTTP pipelining" instead of
"http-pipelining" on the website. Another wording suggestion: replace
".. protocols/applications involved in processing http-pipelining."
with something like ".. protocols/applications involved in processing
pipelined HTTP requests."
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2016-05-16 11:42:51 CEST