On 10.05.2016 16:29, stefan2_at_apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Tue May 10 14:29:56 2016
> New Revision: 1743195
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1743195&view=rev
> Log:
> Follow-up to r1743183: Unbreak FSFS svnadmin tests.
>
> * subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py
> (ensure_list): Converting strings and bytes to lists is a special case.
> Before that, each "element" in them would become a separate
> list element.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py
>
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py?rev=1743195&r1=1743194&r2=1743195&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py Tue May 10 14:29:56 2016
> @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@ def ensure_list(item):
> "If ITEM is not already a list, convert it to a list."
> if isinstance(item, list):
> return item
> + elif isinstance(item, bytes) or isinstance(item, str):
> + return [ item ]
> else:
> return list(item)
I think this is overkill and possibly wrong (and may have been wrong
before, too); the code should probably just be:
if isinstance(item, list):
return item
else:
return [item]
There's no reason to have a third option, unless you also want to
convert tuples to lists — but in that case I'd prefer to have an
explicit check for 'isinstance(item, tuple)' instead of explicit checks
for strings and byte sequences.
-- Brane
Received on 2016-05-10 16:34:20 CEST