Re: [PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl builds: make that a fatal error?

From: James McCoy <jamessan_at_jamessan.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:41:08 -0400

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:53:50AM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> But documentation notwithstanding, it seems like a misfeature. Should
> we change this, so --without-sasl builds will error out if use-sasl=true
> is set? The patch would be simple enough (attached).

Seems reasonable to me.

Cheers,

-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan_at_jamessan.com>

Received on 2016-04-30 04:41:17 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bert Huijben: "RE: [PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl builds: make that a fatalerror?"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "[PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl builds: make that a fatal error?"
In reply to: Daniel Shahaf: "[PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl builds: make that a fatal error?"
Next in thread: Bert Huijben: "RE: [PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl builds: make that a fatalerror?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]