On 4/26/2016 10:41 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.04.2016 10:09, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 26.04.2016 03:48, Stefan wrote:
>>>> On 4/21/2016 18:43, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
>>>>> The 1.8.16 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>>>>> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on April 28th
>>>>> so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by April 27th.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>> Verified integrity and file content against 1.8.16-tag in the SVN
>>>> repository.
>>> Did you also build the sources and run the tests? It's sort of expected.
>> I think it's fine as long as Stefan states explicitly what he has
>> verified (which he has). It's an additional assurance from someone
>> that says "I state that the tarball corresponds to the tag and the
>> branch". It doesn't count for a +1 vote for our "3 votes per platform"
>> rule, but that's fine
> Yup, and this is why I asked. :) It may not be a binding vote but it's
> useful to know about any passing tests on Windows, IMO.
As Johan confirmed, I only verified the integrity of the zip archives
this time.
Since I wasn't too sure whether that's useful, I asked on IRC before and
Daniel stated that as long as it's explicitly stated, it's ok (and to a
certain degree useful :) ).
Just wasn't able to get the testing process done in time for these
versions, since I was lacking the time here to finish that by tomorrow
(already spent all the time I could invest to set up the PGP keys and
read through all the related documentation - not only Apache but also
GnuPG/GPG4Win).
That said, since all of that is done now, I'm aiming to have a full
Windows test setup-up up and running for the next version.
--
Regards,
Stefan Hett
Received on 2016-04-26 11:26:53 CEST