On 08.03.2016 22:40, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote:
> Yes, it would be enough, thanks!
>
>> On 08.03.2016 17:35, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>> I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be
>>> possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do
>>> that
>>>
>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201309.mbox/%3C2
>>> 01309041617.25159.pavlenko_at_tmatesoft.com%3E
>>>
>>> and I'm asking you to do that once again.
>> Would it work for you if we make the constructors package-scope instead
>> of public? You'd still be able to create the objects in your
>> implementation; but the user-facing API really shouldn't allow object
>> creation in these cases.
>>
>> -- Brane
It's been a while ... but this change is on trunk now (r1739704) and
will be released in 1.10. If you find any more instances that could
profit from a private to package-scope constructor change, please let me
know.
-- Brane
Received on 2016-04-18 10:17:39 CEST