In principal this is fine, yes. If the *PMC* are going to vouch for
these binaries, and are willing to help support Infra if/when they
Of course, I will re-iterate that Infra will roll back if any forward
rolling is catastrophic to the service. We are also likely to want to
roll up the repo, in to a tarball or some such before hitting the big
red button. JIC we need to roll back, and we cannot undo svnadmin
upgrade (assuming such an action is needed too).
Perhaps a crash course for the PMC about the stack as is, and how we get
to a deployed update is a good idea? Also, we'd like/need a JIRA issue
for each bump you want (to contain any notices about steps required, or
library changes and so on).
Will you expect us to roll dav_svn et al each time too? If so we should
ensure that your package names match those upstream in Ubuntu ( I assume
James can cope with that, given his email address ;) ).
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015, at 10:00 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Does this work for you, Tony?
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:04 PM, James McCoy
> <jamessan_at_debian.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:53:43AM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Is somebody still working on this?
>> I had mentioned on IRC that I'd provide a PPA based on my Debian
>> packaging. I forgot to follow up and state that it's available:
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan_at_debian.org>
Received on 2015-11-30 15:40:49 CET