On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > Bert Huijben wrote:
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1707196&view=rev
> >>> Log:
> >>> Slightly optimize svn_stringbuf_from_stream() to avoid allocating twice
> >>> more memory and unnecessary memcpy() when LEN_HINT is equal to final
> >>> stringbuf
> >>> length.
> >>> * subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c
> >>> (svn_stringbuf_from_stream): Always preallocate LEN_HINT +
> >>> MIN_READ_SIZE
> >>> bytes to be able perform final read without stringbuf reallocation.
> >> Can you explain why hint + MIN_READ_SIZE instead of something like
> >> MAX(len_hint+1, MIN_READ_SIZE)
> >> I don't know what MIN_READ_SIZE is from just this patch, but it could
> easily be
> >> something like 16 Kbyte, while len_hint could be something like 16 for
> a file like
> >> 'format' that was just statted to obtain the actual size
> >> 16 Kbyte + 16 bytes for a 16 bytes file looks a bit large... And
> allocating 16 + 32
> >> bytes is far more efficient than allocating that huge chunk at once.
> > MIN_READ_SIZE is 64 bytes and it's locally defined in this function.
> > We cannot use MAX(len_hint+1, MIN_READ_SIZE) because main loop
> > reallocates buffer if don't have MIN_READ_SIZE remaining. The current
> > code assumes that MIN_READ_SIZE is small value and I decided to leave
> > this code intact. It could be improved of course, but I wanted to make
> > minimum change first.
> I don't think that was the right fix. One deficiency with the code is
> that it doesn't break out of the loop when end-of-stream is detected,
> which can be reported by a 'short' read. Your change doesn't solve
> that problem in general, although it does solve it for the case where
> the supplied length hint is exactly right.
The short read detection got changed in r1561688.
Before that, svn_stream_read would be called for
which the short read detection was correct. Since
then we have a somewhat inefficient double EOS
I guess the correct way of doing this is revert Ivan's
change and apply something like the attached patch.
> We also have the function
> which performs a virtually identical task. These two functions have
> completely different implementations. svn_string_from_stream() does
> break out of the loop as soon as it detects end-of-stream reported as
> a short read. They also use completely different read sizes
> (MIN_READ_SIZE = 64 bytes vs. SVN__STREAM_CHUNK_SIZE = 16384).
> That is silly: there is no good reason for that, and it is a waste of
> effort maintaining them separately, and discussing separate
> optimizations for each.
> We should make those two functions share the same "best" implementation.
Both functions are rarely used within SVN. I'd say,
implement a svn_string_from_stream as "read into
stringbuf, alloc'ed in scratch_pool + copy to final string".
That preserves and actually improves upon it's current
memory usage pattern while reusing the stringbuf code.
Received on 2015-10-07 14:34:36 CEST