Re: svn commit: r1704847 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c
On 23 September 2015 at 16:42, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danielsh_at_apache.org]
>> Sent: woensdag 23 september 2015 15:39
>> To: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
>> Cc: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1704847 -
>> Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:32:15 +0300:
>> > On 23 September 2015 at 16:29, <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
>> > > Author: danielsh
>> > > Date: Wed Sep 23 13:29:30 2015
>> > > New Revision: 1704847
>> > >
>> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1704847&view=rev
>> > > Log:
>> > > * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c
>> > > (ra_serf_version): Report both built- and run-time versions of
>> > > like we do for everything else.
>> > >
>> > May be we should report them separately only if built and runt-time
>> > versions are different?
>> We unconditionally report both versions for everything. (And I think
>> that's fine.)
> Perhaps we should move the serf version to the standard list of linked
> dependencies and do something smarter there.
We cannot do this, since serf is dependency of libsvn_ra_serf. The
libsvn_subr doesn't link to serf or openssl directly.
What we can do is add another RA vtable member to report RA
Received on 2015-09-24 10:12:32 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev