Stefan Hett <luke1410_at_gmx.de> writes:
> You are absolutely right here and I should have seen that before. Didn't
> take that (obvious) point into account at all.
> I'll come-up with a working version scheme which won't have potential for
> causing this misinterpretation and will make sure that the next releases
> will use that other scheme.
> Think the solution will either be to restart my own version numbering which
> is completely independent from SVN's or go with the alternative you
Thank you :)
Received on 2015-09-19 16:58:52 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev