[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Migrating Subversion issues to ...

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 06:37:30 -0500

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Stefan Hett <stefan_at_egosoft.com> wrote:

> On 9/15/2015 12:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>
>> On 15 September 2015 at 11:59, Bert Huijben < <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
>> bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>>
> >...
>
>> > I think we really have 3 options:
>> >
>> > [ ] Keep our issues on Tigris
>> > [ ] Migrate our issues to a new Bugzilla instance hosted by ASF infra
>> > [ ] Migrate to the standard ASF Jira installation
>>
>
> +1 to JIRA. (and -0 on tigris; -0.5 bugzilla)
>
> >...
>
>> One option to resolve this would be create JIRA plugin with very
>> simple "field renderer" that uses monospaced font. Field renderer is
>> configured per project, so it's technically possible to use it on
>> shared ASF JIRA installation. The only question is whether ASF infra
>> allow us to install such simple plugin (or develop it for us?).
>>
>
> They already have lots of concerns around the JIRA installation. I
> seriously doubt they'd approve any such plugin, and certainly would not
> develop/test such a thing. I'll go ask ...
>
> Do JIRA comments have any sort of formatting available (eg markdown), to
> do the formatting?
>
> Short answer: yes it has
> From JIRA's feature point of view, it has the same features available as
> the description field or any other custom field you add. That said, it can
> be set to use the text- or the wiki-markup renderer.
>

Yup. I just found the following page:

https://confluence.atlassian.com/jira/configuring-renderers-185729478.html

I don't see "Steps to Reproduce" in there, but we won't be converting any
Tigris issues into that field. We don't need monospace there. ... as long
as we have monospace in Description and Comments, then we're good to go.

I'd further posit: we can lose some fidelity in the conversion. The above
seems like we'll get 99%

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2015-09-15 13:37:45 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.