[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.9.0 minimal Python version

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:01:31 +0200

On 23.07.2015 10:30, Stefan Hett wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>> - For 1.9, it's a little late to make any changes, but I would
>>>> consider
>>>> dropping py2.5 support (and converting to the 'except' 'as'
>>>> syntax),
>>>> since for 1.9 py3 support is more important than py2.5 support.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>> I'd rather not mess with the 1.9 branch at this point ... we're so close
>> to the release (I hope).
>>
>> -- Brane
> as a thought for the 1.9 case:
> In case you do not want to drop py2.5 support for 1.9 because it's
> released stating that minimum support already, would it be an option
> to still support py3 in a following patch (1.9.1)? For instance by
> providing py-script versions for older as well as later versions?
>
> Reasoning would be that given that SVN-versions have a lifetime of
> roughly 2 years before the successive version is released it'd be
> quite a limitation if that'd only work with a very old python version...
>
> As an alternative approach: You'd also consider mentioning a minimum
> requirement of python 2.6 just in the docs (no code changes yet) and
> then release 1.9.1 with the actual "fixes". So technically then even
> post release you would not change the minimal system requirements.
>
> (just some thoughts from a user's point of view, if that input would
> be of any benefit)

Daniel and I have just been chatting about this on IRC, and we agreed
that it makes sense to just drop 2.5/2.6 support for 1.9 and trunk; the
proposal is that we declare support for 2.7, and at some point make
1.9.x and trunk compatible with both 2.7 and 3.x.

-- Brane
Received on 2015-07-23 11:02:29 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.