Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:06:47 +0200:
> As discussed elsewhere, this extends the soak period to 28th July. This
> would be a good time to finalize the 1.9 release notes ... please? :)
I've got this about FSFS f7 — Stefan, is it correct?
(The interesting part is the second hunk's first paragraph.)
Daniel
[[[
* docs/release-notes/1.9.html
(#new-feature-compatibility-table): Add #fsfs-improvements.
(#fsfs-improvements): Document how to distinguish fully-featured/native
from partially-featured/upgraded FSFS f7 repositories.
]]]
[[[
Index: 1.9.html
===================================================================
--- 1.9.html (revision 1691121)
+++ 1.9.html (working copy)
@@ -106,6 +106,12 @@
<td>any</td>
<td></td></tr>
<tr>
+ <td>FSFS format 7</td>
+ <td>any</td>
+ <td>1.9</td>
+ <td>1.9</td>
+ <td>Older formats remain supported.</td></tr>
+ <tr>
<td>FSX</td>
<td>any</td>
<td>1.9</td>
@@ -306,9 +312,14 @@
7. For best performance and to enable all features, it is recommended to
perform a full
<a href="http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.9/svn.reposadmin.maint.html#svn.reposadmin.maint.migrate.svnadmin">
-dump / load</a> cycle, see next section.
-</p>
+dump / load</a> cycle. You can tell whether all format 7 features are enabled
+by looking for <tt>FSFS Logical Addressing: yes</tt> in the output of
+<tt>svnadmin info</tt>: if that line is printed, then the repository has
+all format 7 features enabled.
+<p>The next subsection compares performance of repositories created directly as
+format 7 and of repositories upgraded to format 7 from older formats.</p>
+
</div> <!-- fsfs-format7 -->
<div class="h4" id="format7-comparison">
]]]
Received on 2015-07-15 03:02:46 CEST