[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn-mergeinfo-normalizer ideas

From: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:40:41 +0200

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Stefan Hett <stefan_at_egosoft.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm dealing with one remaining case svn-mergeinfo-normalizer normalize
> doesn't seem to be able to handle yet. Would it be possible to add support
> for this?
>
> Case: Eliminate incorrect mergeinfos of pre-branch-revisions.
>
> Looking at the following output:
> Trying to elide mergeinfo from path
> E:/[projects]/XR/clean_source_branch/src/SDKs/bullet
> into mergeinfo at path
> E:/[projects]/XR/clean_source_branch/src
>
> All branches still exist in HEAD.
>
> Try to elide remaining branches:
> CANNOT elide branch /XRebirth/trunk/src/SDKs/bullet
> revisions not movable to parent: 173817,174057,180942,181150
>
> Branches not mentioned in parent:
> /SDKs/BulletPhysics/tags/2.82
> /SDKs/BulletPhysics/trunk
>
> Sub-tree merge info cannot be elided due to the following branches:
> /SDKs/BulletPhysics/tags/2.82
> /SDKs/BulletPhysics/trunk
> /XRebirth/trunk/src/SDKs/bullet
>
> here you see that the revisions 173817,174057,180942,181150 are reported
> to not be movable to the parent.
>
> The thing here is that all of these revisions are effectively referencing
> themselves and therefore should be removable in principle.
>
> The WC is a check-out of
> repo
> \proj1
> \branches
> \proj1v1
>
> The proj1v1 branch was created in revision 184223 from trunk - aka from:
> repo
> \proj1
> \trunk
>
> so all the revisions (173817,174057,180942,181150) are referring to the
> same thing which is implicitly included in the branch (due to its creation
> from trunk at r184223). So these should simply be eliminated, no?
>

Yes, for all paths, their natural history can be considered being an
implicit
part of their merge history, i.e. "they contain all their own changes".
Hence,
they can't be actually missing and the branch entry in your example should
be removed from the mergeinfo.

To do this efficiently requires a fair amount coding, though. I'll give it
a try.

-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2015-07-10 01:40:48 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.