[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1684161 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 20:21:08 +0200

On 08.06.2015 15:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> I didn't think that any test suite failure should be called as release
> blocker and after thinking more I agree that this particular failure
> also should not be considered as blocker. Even it breaks my release
> testing scripts, since failure in one configurations causes abort of
> all test run :(

Yeah, that's painful ... of course, you can always fix your scripts. :)

> My original intention was "we need this fix in 1.9.x before 1.9.0 to
> speed up release, because it could slowdown release signing process",
> but I should put this in Note field instead marking nomination as a
> release-blocker.

Ack.

> But I think that test failures could be release blocker in case it
> happens in common configuration or affects many tests.

Ack, makes sense.

-- Brane
Received on 2015-06-08 20:21:17 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.