[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1683544 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:02:42 +0300

On 4 June 2015 at 16:34, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
> I would say it is safer to cache SVN_INVALID_REVNUM (or another certainly
> invalid revision number) than to set the potentially valid r0.
>
Hi Bert,

Any repository has zero revision, so it's pretty safe to assume that
repository youngest revision at least 1 revision. But I may to improve
code if you think that current approach is not safe enough. 

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2015-06-04 16:03:18 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.