On 17.03.2015 13:28, Marc Strapetz wrote:
> We are currently faced with the decision whether to release a new
> "major" version of SmartSVN which is compatible with Subversion 8 or
> wait for Subversion 9 release. The two main factors driving this
> decision are:
>
> (i) whether Subversion 1.9 will be able to access Subversion 1.8 working
> copies, without making it unusable for version 1.8. As far as I
> understood from [1] this will be most likely the case.
>
> (ii) when the anticipated release date of version 9 will be (measured in
> months).
Sorry for the version number confusions, it should always read "version
1.8" instead of "version 8" and "version 1.9" instead of "version 9".
-Marc
On 17.03.2015 13:28, Marc Strapetz wrote:
> We are currently faced with the decision whether to release a new
> "major" version of SmartSVN which is compatible with Subversion 8 or
> wait for Subversion 9 release. The two main factors driving this
> decision are:
>
> (i) whether Subversion 1.9 will be able to access Subversion 1.8 working
> copies, without making it unusable for version 1.8. As far as I
> understood from [1] this will be most likely the case.
>
> (ii) when the anticipated release date of version 9 will be (measured in
> months).
>
> I'd appreciate your ideas on (ii). Of course I understand that this is a
> moving target and current estimations may be wrong.
>
> [1] http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2015-03/0098.shtml
>
> -Marc
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on 2015-03-17 13:37:20 CET