Re: [VOTE} Merge svn-auth-x509 branch to trunk?
On 1/27/15 4:55 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I think we should get this merged to trunk.
> The original email asking to start this merge happened back in August here:
> Since that email the checksum formatting code was removed and there have been
> some API changes to make the API more capable of fully representing the
> certificates. As well as quite a few bug fixes.
> You can get a diff with:
> svn diff ^/subversion/trunk_at_1655188 ^/subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509
> Per the decision in Berlin 2013, I'm asking for a vote to bring this branch
> into trunk. This is currently holding up 1.9 branch, so I'd like to get this
> on trunk.
> There are some further fixes I'd like to make but I'm going to hold off on
> doing that for now and do so on trunk.
I'm going to merge this tomorrow afternoon so that we can start applying some
of the fixes that we've found reviewing it. I don't see any reason to delay
merging because of those fixes. Everything we're finding is very weird edge
cases (which I'd expected us to find anyway).
Received on 2015-01-29 06:51:37 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev