Re: [VOTE} Merge svn-auth-x509 branch to trunk?
On 28.01.2015 01:55, Ben Reser wrote:
> I think we should get this merged to trunk.
> The original email asking to start this merge happened back in August here:
> Since that email the checksum formatting code was removed and there have been
> some API changes to make the API more capable of fully representing the
> certificates. As well as quite a few bug fixes.
> You can get a diff with:
> svn diff ^/subversion/trunk_at_1655188 ^/subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509
> Per the decision in Berlin 2013, I'm asking for a vote to bring this branch
> into trunk. This is currently holding up 1.9 branch, so I'd like to get this
> on trunk.
> There are some further fixes I'd like to make but I'm going to hold off on
> doing that for now and do so on trunk.
+1 to merge.
Once on trunk, it would be nice to add some tests for certs that use
SHA-256, SHA-384 and/or SHA-512 in the signature algorithm.
Received on 2015-01-28 10:53:36 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev