Re: On pool / memory usage debugging

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:23:10PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>
> > I think this extra walk is pointless most of the time and is just making
> > our nominally O(1) copy operation slower. Locks on the copy source do
> > not prevent a copy.
>
> Oops! I meant to write "Locks on the copy source held by somebody else
> do not prevent a copy".
>
> --
> Philip

Thanks for digging up the history. I was wondering too whether this walk
is really needed but ended up assuming it had always been there.

Should we raise an issue with mod_dav developers? (gstein?)
Received on 2014-12-09 12:18:45 CET