Re: Removing leftover backport branches

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:08:08 +0000

Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> So now we need to:
>>
>> * undo the merge of the 1.8.x-r1611379 branch
>
> +1.

r1643849.

>> * re-nominate my original nomination.
>
> +1.

r1643849 and r1643850.

I down-graded all our votes (including my own) from +1 to +0 because whatever we did before voting we clearly didn't test the branch mentioned in the nomination :-( I'm now reviewing and testing the nomination, using a merge from the (now correctly) mentioned branch.

- Julian
Received on 2014-12-08 18:08:40 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stefan Fuhrmann: "On pool / memory usage debugging"
Previous message: Stefan Fuhrmann: "Re: Removing leftover backport branches"
In reply to: Stefan Fuhrmann: "Re: Removing leftover backport branches"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]